|
Post by ddub on Jan 18, 2012 20:40:40 GMT -5
My thread on my 72 Stinger I WT got me to thinking due to the discussion there. What information can be broken down by the serial number? I have never seen any information on this. In fact years ago, I posted this picture of my SN on a Scorpion related site and never heard a peep. Of the thread I was told it really didn't tell you much Is there any model designation? It doesn't appear so. It looks like I could take a plate off of a Mark III and put it on a Mark I and no one would be the wiser? Lets use this thread to diagnose the Vins of Scorps. Post what ya know please!
|
|
|
Post by stingerIII on Jan 18, 2012 23:29:04 GMT -5
Maybe we can figure this out by comparing and evaluating serial numbers from sleds from the same years.
My Stinger I 293 narrow track has 2-13410 ddubs Stinger I wt 440 has 2-10752
The first number could be model year 2 for 72 (I will check my 72 Stinger II tomorrow) The second number could indicate the model ,1 for stinger I as both sleds match on the first and second numbers (both being 72 Stinger I's one a wide track ,one a narrow track)
71 Stinger III 1-18102 71 Superstinger 1-28213
My two 71 Scorpions both start with the 1 possibly indicating model year of 71 the second number could be the model range Stinger III with a 1 and a Superstinger with a 2 ,will check out the numbers on a 71 Stinger II at the farm to see what numbers match and what are different.
Tomorrow I will post 77 Whip and 77 Lilwhip . I will also post the serial number for a 68 Mark I so it can be compared to .
I know that the serial numbers did not mean much at the point of new sale other than to register warranty , licence the vehicle and make the sale legal.
|
|
|
Post by ddub on Jan 19, 2012 0:23:07 GMT -5
Stinger, I'll grab some of my vins over the next week or so. I'll be on the road the next few days.
I should mention that the vin showed above is my 69 Silver Scorp. I don't know if that plate would have been a 69 or 70 as it was registered as a 70.
|
|
|
Post by scorp11 on Jan 19, 2012 23:52:09 GMT -5
From what I have been told, they only thing that "designates" anything on the scorpions serial number is the first number. That indicates the year. I am sure the rest of the number would indicate some sort of production order, but from what I've been told nothing more than that.
Scorpion was not real good about keeping these type of records. Not like some where you can learn a lot about a sled through the serial number.
|
|
|
Post by stingerIII on Jan 22, 2012 19:08:05 GMT -5
I think scorp11 is onto something my 72 Stinger II with the new chassis and hood for 72 has the serial number 2-14485 starting with a 1 same as the two Stinger I's.(PD 5-71)
My 74 Superstinger is 4-7355412 PD 73
Now my Mark I has the serial number 021-0370 I have been told it is a 1968 model but maybe its a 1970 with a 68 hood striping.
|
|
|
Post by stingerIII on Jan 22, 2012 19:20:51 GMT -5
On further research I believe that it is a 1970 Mark I since they were basically unchanged from 68 to 70(the Mark I's)all the other models had the new flip hood .
|
|
|
Post by admin on Feb 24, 2012 19:13:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jan 12, 2013 9:46:14 GMT -5
A post from krashusmc on another thread was related to this thread so I thought I would paste it below,
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 8, 2013 18:28:57 GMT -5
Here's a 1968 MARK VIN plate,
|
|
macandg
L1 Scorpion - The Great Snowmobile
Posts: 23
|
Post by macandg on Apr 10, 2013 14:33:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 10, 2013 20:04:41 GMT -5
Excellent feedback macandg. Let's see if we can prove or disprove that concept.
|
|
|
Post by scorp11 on Apr 10, 2013 20:14:34 GMT -5
With Scorpion, I don't think it worked that way. The number would indicate the sequence they came off the line, but I am pretty sure model cannot be deduced from the serial number.
From all I have been told, the production runs built a variety of models in a variety of orders. Serial numbers (other than the first digit) were sequential. Even the bullwhip numbers fit into that sequence, they just happen to fall into a narrow band of build numbers as they were built at once.
Other manufacturers were different. Some you could even tell what the engine / trim level was by the serial number.
|
|
macandg
L1 Scorpion - The Great Snowmobile
Posts: 23
|
Post by macandg on Apr 11, 2013 5:46:03 GMT -5
Ok, I compiled the numbers from this thread. Take a look at two major observations.
If the SN is actually just a sequential number regardless of model, then we should expect to see the number get larger each year. BUT- that is not the case. Notice the list below (compiled from this thread discussion) as it shows models from 1972 having smaller numbers than models from 1971- and vice-versa.
Therefore, it appears the SN indicates THREE things: year, model and sequence.
1971 Stinger III 1-18102 1971 Super Stinger I 1-28213 1971 Super Stinger 1-26832 1972 Stinger I 2-13410 1972 Stinger I 2-10752 1972 Stinger II 2-14485
HOWEVER, I also noticed this pattern changes pre-1970 and with the 1974 example. So, if I may be so bold, and in agreement with the original challenge, I'd like to see more VIN's posted from all years and all models.
At some point this theory will be proven, or dispelled. At the very least, we will learn something I'm sure. Like I say- I'm a geek and I don't mind geeking this up. Who else is a geek...?
|
|
macandg
L1 Scorpion - The Great Snowmobile
Posts: 23
|
Post by macandg on Apr 11, 2013 6:05:13 GMT -5
Ok, here are some more numbers from my Scorpion tradings... The pattern from 1971-72 continues through 1973-74. Notice the production date and SN are another illustration it is NOT sequential as the July '74 number is smaller than Dec '73 number.
1973 Super Stinger 3-52452 1974 Super Stinger 4-73554 1974 Super Stinger 4-73886 production date 12/73 1974 Super Stinger 4-65131 production date 7/74
NOTE: the July 1974 production number seems like it should be a model year 1975, but that is what the tag has stamped on it. So, again, I say we should encourage more numbers to continue this idea until a so called conclusion is found.
Keep the numbers coming in, eh.
|
|
|
Post by scorp11 on Apr 11, 2013 14:00:40 GMT -5
The first digit before the dash is part of the serial number. Later years don't have the dash at all. So they are still sequential if you look at your numbers. Each year is a larger number.
The only thing I don't know is if Scorpion had more than 1 line running at a time. If that is the case, it would be possible to find overlap within a year by the build date depending on how the serial numbered each production line.
The 74 with a build date of 7/74 would be a 75. Makes me question if someone messed up the first digit on a tag. You couldn't have one built that late as a 74 model
|
|
macandg
L1 Scorpion - The Great Snowmobile
Posts: 23
|
Post by macandg on Apr 11, 2013 17:49:53 GMT -5
For us to know for sure, we would need SN and production dates from the tags.
Notice the production date and sequence of the two 1974 examples...If we assume the stamped tag is correct, then the sequence is backwards. But if we agree with scorp11 and the tag is an error, then his theory could be correct. But, then I would ask, how many more tags are in error...?
At any rate, more tag numbers and production dates will help solve the pattern... I say keep the numbers coming.
stinger III pledged to offer some numbers from his '77 whips.
|
|
|
Post by scorp11 on Apr 11, 2013 23:16:07 GMT -5
I applaud your effort and enthusiasm, I am just giving you what I have learned over the years. I have learned to never say never with Scorpion. The statement below. . . I am very confident is not true as an across the board statement
No matter what, you aren't going to know for sure for every year. There are simply not enough sleds left untouched that you can get enough sample data. Remember there were 3 different ownership groups over the years. They may have changed there practices anywhere along the way.
Here for example are some Bull Whip numbers from a Vintage Sleds post. Hopefully it helps you understand how difficult it will be to accurately draw conclusions from just the numbers you can collect.
7-110042 7-110117 7-110126 7-110093 7-110114 7-109974 7-110060 7-110048 7-110024 7-110660 7-110154 7-109970
All that posted build dates posted 9/76
So, based on those numbers (12 out of roughly 200 built) we have about 6% coverage. Not great, but pretty good for 35 year old sleds. Based on your logic, 7 is the year, the first 1 is the "model". 1 would mean "bullwhip". Right ?
|
|
|
Post by scorp11 on Apr 11, 2013 23:28:02 GMT -5
Now for some more numbers from the same post.
7-105393 - 77 Whip 7-109669 - 77 Range Whip 7-111914 - 77 Range Whip Sting
That right there says the second number isn't the model as they all have 1 as the second number. At least in 1977. It appears very clear, looking at these numbers the only number that indicates anything is the first one. But with other models / year you may not find build numbes that hit the hundred thousand boundry. Which is what it takes to show that the first number is not the model. Probably even more true with the older models.
What does it say ? Looks like Bullwhips were in the ballpark of between 7-109970 and 7-110154. IF the numbers are sequential, we have not accounted for more than 200 bullwhips, so the prevailing "theory" that there were only 200 bullwhips built has not been dis-proven as we have only 184 in the range.
What you may find is numbers may not be in set ranges either. Like I said I never had anyone tell me if there were or were not multiple lines. Serial numbers with build dates won't even tell that if there were multiple lines.
You may also be able to get an idea on what they may have started at within a given year.
And as with any statistical analysis you will have some anomalies. Some like the 74 Stinger with a 7/74 build date are pretty easy to dismiss by applying a little common sense logic. Others will not be.
I have never seen a 1981 serial numbered sled other than a Sidewinder. I looked for 3 years as the Scorpion Reunion. They sold sleds in 1981. Does that mean (as many have said) that the 81's were all built in 1980 ? The 1980's were supposedly built in Thief River, did Cat change the numbering scheme then ? Or, were there just none there.
Hopefully you can understand how it will be very hard to draw the absolute positives you want from just the numbers. Like I said I have spoken with many who were involved at the time and still have more questions than answers.
|
|
macandg
L1 Scorpion - The Great Snowmobile
Posts: 23
|
Post by macandg on Apr 12, 2013 7:30:33 GMT -5
jeepers scorp11...and I thought I was a geek... (humor intended)
Like I said, more numbers will provide more insight...and now I know (or don't know) more than before. Thank you scorp11 and others for guiding me to wisdom in my geekness.
This is the point where intelligence and wisdom collide. Intelligence is knowing information, wisdom is knowing when to stop looking for information. (or something like that)
I'll turn my enthusiasm toward searching for more machines to collect.
|
|
|
Post by scorp11 on Apr 12, 2013 8:22:58 GMT -5
LOL. . . I was in the computer industry for far to long to completely hide my "geekiness" I guess :-) When you have to do analysis for "engineering types" you get pretty good at statistical analysis. . . . Plus I can type pretty fast !!! If you notice from my other post, I am working on putting a registry out on my site. It would be nice to have for just these type of conversations. I do think it will show some sort of order things got built. Like I said in my previous post. There were many groups that owned "Scorpion". While they all seemed to be equally bad at keeping records, there may be some production differences between the groups. This post might be a good read before you go off acquiring a bunch of sleds Entertaining if nothing else vintagesleds.com/bs/index.php/topic,79511.0.html
|
|